Bitcoin (BTC) continues to break records, reaching new all-time highs and gaining acceptance from investors and even governments. This growing global interest raises a vital question for the Muslim community: Is Bitcoin Shariah-compliant? This analysis explores Bitcoin’s compatibility with Islamic principles through the lens of the Sharlife Methodology.
Islamic scholars are divided on Bitcoin’s permissibility. Some, like Datuk Dr. Mohd Daud Bakar, consider Bitcoin halal due to its potential as a medium of exchange and store of value. Others, like Mufti Shawki Allam, caution against its speculative nature and the possibility of misuse, like gambling. These differing views highlight the importance of evaluating Bitcoin through a structured Shariah-compliance framework.
The Sharlife Methodology for Shariah compliance analysis comprises three key scopes:
Bitcoin, the first decentralized cryptocurrency, operates without central intermediaries, allowing peer-to-peer transactions. This structure provides a unique basis for Shariah analysis, examining Bitcoin’s alignment with Islamic principles across project design, token utility, reward systems, legitimacy, and team background.
Bitcoin aligns with Shariah principles due to its nature as a cryptocurrency that operates without interest or central control. It serves as a medium of exchange, allowing transparent transactions for goods and services. Bitcoin’s limited supply and long-lasting nature make it a store of value, similar to gold. Its ability to enable payments across borders, facilitating international payments without the need for currency conversions. Additionally, Bitcoin's mining rewards are based on voluntary transaction fees, ensuring fairness and avoiding interest-based systems, further supporting its alignment with Shariah principles.
To determine whether Bitcoin qualifies as a legitimate object of a contract (ma'qud 'alaih) under Shariah principle, we must evaluate it against the principles for ‘urudh (commodities). Specifically, the Shariah requires the object of a sale to have a beneficial use case and to be free from impermissible use cases.
Bitcoin can be useful as a medium of exchange and a form of technology, which meets the requirement of having a clear benefit. However, its high price volatility and lack of real backing raise concerns in some cases.Using Bitcoin for lawful purposes, such as payments and innovation, is acceptable. However, using it for illegal activities renders it questionable in specific situations. Depends on how the token holder uses it.
The benefit of Bitcoin is generally lawful when used for legitimate purposes like payments. However, if it is used for impermissible activities, it will not affect the Shariah status of the token, but the impermissible act is still considered impermissible. Therefore, the token holder should avoid sing Bitcoin to engage in Shariah non-compliant activities.
Bitcoin's legitimacy is supported by several key factors that align with principles of transparency.
Firstly, Bitcoin's legitimacy is strengthened by its clear and publicly available whitepaper. This foundational document outlines the system's purpose, design, and functionality in a transparent manner. By providing a detailed explanation of how Bitcoin operates, it ensures openness and allows users and developers to understand and verify its workings. This transparency aligns with Shariah principles, which emphasize clarity and trust in financial transactions.
Additionally, the Bitcoin project itself is recognized as legitimate due to its robust technology and secure protocol. The Bitcoin network operates on a decentralized blockchain, which is maintained by a vast network of distributed computers (miners) worldwide. This decentralization makes the system highly resistant to manipulation, fraud, or control by a single entity. Its secure design, powered by cryptographic techniques, ensures that transactions are protected from unauthorized changes.
Based on Sharlife Methodology, in term of People Analysis, Bitcoin (BTC) does not fully meet the established criteria for approval. It falls into a "grey" area because, while we know the name of its founder, Satoshi Nakamoto, we do not know the true identity or face of this individual or group. This lack of transparency about the founder raises some concerns.
However, the decentralized nature of Bitcoin helps to mitigate potential risks. With thousands of miners distributed across the globe, the possibility of any single entity or group manipulating the system is extremely low and more to impossible. This is the core strength of decentralization millions of people participate in maintaining the network by staking or mining. This widespread participation makes it highly resistant to manipulation, such as a 51% attack, where a single party would need to control more than half of the network's computing power.
Based on the Sharlife Methodology, Bitcoin aligns with key Shariah principles across various aspects. Its decentralized and transparent structure, ethical reward mechanisms, and legitimate use cases as a store of value and medium of exchange indicate its compatibility with Islamic finance. While interpretations of Shariah principle may vary, Bitcoin’s features can generally be considered Shariah-compliant, providing a viable financial tool for Muslims worldwide.
As the cryptocurrency ecosystem continues to evolve, frameworks like the Sharlife Methodology will be essential for guiding the faithful in evaluating Shariah-compliant digital assets.